PETERBOROUGH & KAWARTHA REGION
Local Bus - Advertising
Here's a great example of why government should keep their hands off of the private
sector. You, government, govern for all the people and not just some. You cannot
create laws at the whim of a few at a cost to few others. Speaking of costs and
in the case of buses you are taking the bread out of the mouth of private sector.
Media companies and others, that survive on advertising.
Only Communist regimes compete against themselves!
But you know, I'm still just me!!!
Editorial PTBOregion.com, April 5, 2017
Hospital Parking - Toronto Costs
Why in the name of all that's holy do we always compare to Toronto. Want to compare, well compare disposable income. Someone in Peterborough doing the same job for the same pay has a $12,000 to $20,000 per year advantage over the same person in Toronto. So let's not go there. The day the NDP planted the MNR in Peterborough was the beginning of the end for the private sector here. World economics escalated that time frame. Now we have absolutely no advantages over Toronto other then a smaller work force that is not as transient. Now the employer must compete with Toronto in a region with a much smaller, less specialized work force and other then a better environment for the employee there is no advantage, only disadvantages.
This all leads to the comment that the Hospital feels justified to make 400% profit from parking because they are cheaper then Toronto. $3,000,000 with an out of pocket cost of $600,000 that's 400% profit above costs. Let's put this into the real world, an undocumented tax at best. Let's go further into the real world; a developed acre of land can be had for roughly $250,000 in Peterborough and $2,500,000 in Toronto. Having said that then Peterborough Hospital parking should max out at $2.00 instead of $10.00. 10% of the cost of the Toronto parking to keep things in THEIR perspective. Amazing, $2.00 would be 20% and 20% of $3,000,000 is $600,000 hence covering the costs they claim. Funny how the real world works isn't it. Logic versus greed!
So let's drop the rate to $4.00 per day maximum and you will still collect $1,200,000. $600,000 in costs plus an additonal $600,000 in profits, undocumented taxes! That is 100% profit! There isn't a business on the face of the earth that wouldn't jump for joy if they could think in terms of 100% PROFIT.
But you know, I'm still just me!!!
Editorial PTBOregion.com, April 5, 2017
From The West - Is Best
Le's think about a couple of things,
But you know,
Trudeau - Quebec
Bombardier - Mainly Quebec
Bailout - Bombardier
Executive Salary Exploitation
Past Liberal Scandals
Let's just think about that for a minute.
Canada, it seems, has always run best when the Prime Minister comes from the West and the party in power are the Conservatives. When I think of bad Prime Ministers I think of Trudeau, Mulroney, Chretien, Trudeau. One of those is, simply, a Liberal in Conservative threads.
I'm still just me!!!
Editorial PTBOregion.com, April 3, 2017
$100,000 PLUS CLUB
One thing to say and only one thing.
But you know,
Please media, visit "major" local businesses and ask them
to give you the number of people earning in excess of $100,000. Not names,
because the private sector is just that, private.
If less in the private sector are in those brackets then you
have to ask yourself, how can we continue paying those numbers in the public
sector? The private sector, the only ones carrying the freight (filling the
tax pot out where all the of the public sector dips), must earn the
same or more.
What do you think, does Canada need her swamp drained too?
I'm still just me!!!
Editorial PTBOregion.com, April 3, 2017
The Gift - That Wasn't
Don't you just love your local MP or MPP coming in and doling out your cash as if was their own. Basking in the glory and love of it all while those who fill the pot are too busy working to, you know, fill the pot.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 30, 2017
They remind me of people who give anonymously and then run
around telling everyone what they did. I suppose the ego is larger then the
heart. You know what I mean, "Hey, don't tell anyone but I gave $1,000
dollars to the such and such because it helps poor people". Duh... OK.
Well that's exactly what the MP and MPP are doing. Look how hard I'm working for you to give your money to whomever without even asking you.
That's because I'm brighter then you are and I can just make the decision.
Now if they weren't egomaniacs, each and every elected official out there, they would simply publish a list.
That would simply say the Government of Canada or wherever has bequeathed on your behalf so many dollars to such and such.
Does that make me an egomaniac for wanting those who receive the gift to know that each and every hard working Canadian who fill that pot, pays that bill to give.
So come on, put some humility into the thing. Show us you made a really tough decision and are giving from the heart not the head or the place you sit.
Oh and stop all the wasteful advertising, we get tired of seeing your mug shot, spending our money, on every venture large or small it seems.
Hopefully, you also understand, that when you give to one company for example, you are taking from another company, that may very well be the competitor of the one getting the booty.
Weaken one to lose business so another can get that business. That's the reason government should stick to governing and let business stick to business.
As socialists your favourite phrase must be "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". That only works in one system and Canada hasn't dropped to that level yet.
That's my bit for today and tomorrow is Friday so we'll be saying, TGIF.
Whoops is TGIF still politically correct or do we need to say T*IF. It does sound more colourful, graphically speaking, but just doesn't fit with the Canadian Way!
But you know, I'm still just me!!!
Holy Cow - Can We Do That?
APARTMENTS, from $508 per month
- TOWN HOUSES, from $650 per month
- HOMES. from $720 per month
Where can I get these? Well, you have to go to Elliot Lake.
A community that appears to have assessed itself and decided they are a retirement
town. That's true innovation, understanding your weaknesses and acting on
them to build strength.
Pie in the sky ideas, concepts, committees, consultants or anything else that
only churns wheels, create costs but really in the end accomplishes little.
not innovation it is stagnation, accompanied by slow death.
When you become a community like Peterborough has, you need
to innovate. Being one who doesn't like taking others ideas, I find here
that I must. Innovation here involves taking the best of two or three communities
who were in a similar position. Communities that have turned the corner and
adapted new concepts to their particular needs.
The model I chose to talk about is Elliot Lake.
It is the most desirable for Peterborough. Simply because we can do better
and offer more. Why do I say that?
Proximity to Toronto
Multiple Transit systems and routes to Toronto.
Tourism resources abound.
Reasonable Central Core with excellent malls.
Entire town is serviced by public transit.
Regional Health Centre.
College and University
Artists and artisans region
Markets, Festivals and more
Some will say, but you forgot the Airport. I'll discuss the Airport at a later time along with annexation, toxic land and more.
So what needs to be done. Many things but first get
the landlords together, establish a fair market price for apartments, condos,
and detached homes. A monopoly by any other name is still a monopoly but without
a combined effort the model cannot be duplicated.
What does Elliot Lake offer that we don't? A municipal government
that works to reduce taxes and costs. They did some deep studies on all
municipal services and utilized provincial and regional services were
advantageous. There are many areas that can
and with a bit of help from provincial legislation we can have some major
cost reductions here
Looking at a 3 bedroom bungalow in Elliot Lake the stated taxes are $1,551. That may or may not be typical as I haven't gone into too deep but it is as starting point.
We have options here in Peterborough. We can carry on with
the tax and spend crowd or we improve our services and lower our costs. We
looking at pie in the sky and stop funding those who can only do that.
We need to assess just what we are, before we can even start to think about
what direction to go. We have the cart in front of the horse. If you notice
even the auto industry understands that the pull system works much better then
A long winded statement that simply says we need to get realistic!
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 29, 2017
Political Correctness - A Pet Peeve
It's not how a person says something it's what that person is saying! That's all that counts.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 28, 2017
The smug and self-loving elitists believe that using some terms over others is what sets us apart from the animals. You can find these individuals hovering over every word someone says. They are actually naive enough to believe that how a person says something defines them, rather then what they are saying. I agree, when you point to and out political correctness you are defining yourself as valueless individual only capable of teaching and not of being in the real world.
I have found that the smaller the mind the larger the words
they use. The smaller the mind the more complex they attempt to make their
statements sound. The smaller the mind the better the entertainment their
words provide to those who live in, yes, the real world. I also believe that
fanaticism is a relative of fantasy and those who would attempt to force
their perverted ways on others are living an existence that in reality, is
not living at all They are called, by what is not politically correct, sheeple,
led by the leaderless class to humour the rest.
These types must go through life patting themselves on the back daily. Telling themselves and all who will listen just how great they are. Elitists of the new socialist order must recruit and train them so the common folk can have a laugh at their jesters.
You cannot mandate normalness. You can only mandate laws
and when those laws tell people how to speak or how not to speak it is a
perversion of freedom. Most things in life need to be earned, respect is
the highest reward for a life well lived. How much respect do you garner
you spend your life looking down on others.
Hear what a person is saying, not what yuo want them to
say or how you want them to say it.
Lawyer Wanted - Potential Class Action Suit
It seems the wanton spending by the City of Peterborough after rolling out
project after project such annexation, expropriation and many more indicate
one thing, they have money. That money is burning a hole in their pocket and
that money rightfully belongs to each and everyone who has contributed to make
PDI a valuable commodity. A commodity the City was given by the Provincial
government at no charge and they, the City, immediately, placed a multi-million
dollar lien against the utility.
If there is a lawyer in the house who wants a real class action lawsuit here it is. Work for nothing but take 25% of the spoils and represent each and everyone who is affected and wants to be represented.
This must be started before they spend the booty. First thing the money needs to be locked up tight, until a suit is settled.
We would of course want you to sue for your fee as well, 25% of $70,000,000 means a potential $17,500,000. I'm sure you've had better days but what the heck, stoop down.
I'll be writing to some large firms who specialize in this as well.
Remember, Ontario Hydro might fall into one of the cracks for not really ensuring the stake holders were in agreement. These concerns were voiced by many, meeting after meeting that all fell on deaf ears.
There's the gauntlet, to be picked up or left.
In this author's opinion it's time we elected people with
our best interest at heart.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 27, 2017
LDSS to be Demolished - Questions Spring Eternal
Sure it's only one wing, sure we paid to have it built and now we'll pay to have it torn down and then we'll pay again at some point in the future to have it rebuilt.
Why not try something different for a change. Why not turn
it into doctors, dentists, accountants or consultants offices or all of the
above. You know, try to make some money on it to lessen the burden on the public,
rather then increase it. Even less work if you lease it out
to a company that will do al that for you!
I know, I know our little darlings won't be safe with cars
going by. Have you heard of multiple speed bumps, have you heard of fences,
you know, fence our little darlings in. It's a school right? Schools are
supposed to be places of learning and as important,
places of competent teaching. They can teach our little darlings how to behave
when not on a field or elsewhere.
Just a suggestion, for until we get our very own Donald
Trump maybe, just maybe
we can avoid that and have the public sector become competent and responsible
for their actions or inactions, as the case might be.
Please stop electing people who can only figure out how to spend money and appoint or hire those with the same open purse attitude.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 25, 2017
Annexation - part 3 -
I admit it, I misspoke (nice politically correct term simply
meaning lied). Sorry, for a minute I must have thought I was
a politician. But you know, I'm still just me!!!
We will be doing
We're not waiting for the archives, we have some information
and depending on how
will depend on how or if we use
that. One little thing is a suggestion that some of that land may be toxic,
we need some proof of that.
the archives in a day or so, we are also attempting to get https://canadianexposure.com
up and running.
Editorial PTBOregion, March 25, 2017
Organizing - Archives
We apologize for no article, we are just organizing the Archive
Coming soon, more on Annexation based on some comments we've
- Right after that we'll talk about the Expropriation that's just started
- When we're done with our archive area only the latest article plus links
to the last five will be on the homepage.
- Please remember the two articles at the very bottom will be here, on the homepage for a long time
part 2 - rewritten
We’re only changing maintenance companies, we’re
not buying the land!
The question is who benefits from the change?
That’s a simple one. The landowners’ benefit
and the county and city both lose as one gives up annual revenue
and the other takes on more costs to fulfill services required.
So why are we paying $75,000,000 why aren’t they, the
landowners, paying? I’m
sure the brain trust will tell you two things, they will pay
in the long run and we need it to get industry to locate here. Baloney,
They’re wrong again. Till you fix the
root cause you will never entice industry here other then the
kind that relies
on the tax pot to keep them in business. You know, something
like our cash hog the airport that was supposed to bring business
and generate profits. Speaking of the airport aren’t
there TOXIC LANDS there so who
is going to pay for the cleanup, the County or the City after
$75,000,000. Good money
after bad it’s called.
Let’s start at the backend and pretend we’re buying
Pay $10,000 per acre very generous.
Mortgage the whole thing at 3% over 25 years.
That’s a $41,400,000 mortgage.
Cost, P&I, over the 25 years, $58,777,200
Where on earth did the $75,000,000 come from?
$16,000,000 unexplained and yes some of the land already has
properties on it, we know, we’re not politicians.
Repeat: We’re only changing maintenance companies. We’re
not buying the land. Both maintenance companies, Township and
City, are not for profit.
This is really a Provincial Problem that needs
to be fixed at that end of things. They can mandate that the losing entity from annexation must be compensated, say 5 years, of property taxes on the parcel based on an average of the last three years. But wait, it won’t
buy them votes! It won’t let them look like big timers
spending our money like drunken sailors on leave that they
The dog and pony show about services is just that, a dog and
pony show. Services stay as they are until a reason, payment
in like and kind, is created to change that. Usually that reason
is that a developer will want to use a large tract of that
land for a subdivision and will need services from the City
such as sewers, water all without electric consideration now
that we can no longer supply our own needs. Those kinds of
costs can go on the backend of property taxes for a certain
number of years.
Current taxes charged, after annexation, would
provide the ongoing basic services. Protection, trash pick
up, road maintenance
and all the other good things already in place. Some services
need to be increased, maybe. We would collect the current tax
base and that would include all current services
provided by the county for that region. By them joining a larger
entity, the City of Peterborough, we should actually realize
a savings there. Remember the sale of PDI; one of the glowing
reasons was that we would be better served by a larger entity.
This City it seems, treats taxpayers as if
they are mushrooms that spew
dollars at the City's behest. Sadly that has been
the way it was!
Are we really ALL in this together. Let’s rethink
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 13, 2017
Annexation - part 1
It never ceases to amaze how most politicians can only solve
a problem in one way, throw money at it, our money. This annexation
issue is simply silly.
The county should willingly give up the land
with the following conditions. They should be compensated for
5 years of lost property taxes
on the affected properties. This payment by a City should be
in a single lump sum. Regulation loving Liberals in Toronto
should mandate that as a rule, with the side note that 50%
or more of affected property owners need to agree to the annexation.
So here's a scapegoat to blame if you can’t
get your way, property owners making
the final decision. Heaven forbid, the long sought electoral
Most property owners would go for Annexation,
as in the long run it would increase the value of their properties
were added. Case in point, the Lily Lake Road farms
that might have been worth in the hundreds of thousands as
in multiple millions to developers. Who wouldn’t go for
that kind of a profit jump other then true land lovers?
It’s to the Unelectric City’s benefit. Even
if development was five years off or more, other then a
added expenses, they would recoup their 5-year tax payment
from the current property owners. No fuss, no muss, no
bother and no change to that point. A done deal and ka-ching
two municipal cash registers, also known as a bureaucrat’s
So what’s the problem? Is that too simple? A clear,
easy formula signed off by all parties with the final voice
left up to the people involved. We call it freedom and forcing
something we call that dictatorial.
How can something so simple require so many
man-hours to mess up by our Municipal Politicians and their
minions? Maybe it’s
not about results but about getting five minutes of fame. Or
justifying man-hours to fill the time. Or maybe someone saw
a pie in the sky payout, raised expectations and then reality
set in. Now neither of the two kiddies will say, "whoops
So how about it Jeffery, like “kids
in the sand box” drag those two out, kicking
and screaming if need be. Confer with Mommy in
Toronto and git-r-done! No need for a long
legal missive. All that is needed is a definition of the vote.
should simply be: each Municipal tax dollar assessed on affected
properties over the past 3 year period equals the number of
votes given to the current person responsible for paying the
municipal taxes on the affected property. So simple, even Toronto
understand it as a regulation by the people and for the people.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 11, 2017
NEWS, is it FALSE
or are YOU?
Simply visit almost any news source to find the Chicken
Little type proclaiming the sky is falling, the sky is
falling. Well it’s not. News, not unlike most businesses,
is in a transition. Also, like most businesses, some things
they project are false and some are not. A neutral, truly
neutral news source is difficult to find. They place you
in their little gangs of Liberal or Conservative, anti
or pro this or that and I could create a list longer then
the print or dialogue of most news sources.
You have to be a realist and take a, you know, realistic
look at what is being said and who is saying it. You have to evaluate does this
source have a bias and if so can I trust anything they
say. Instead of creating a class culture of sex, colour, religion
or origin, a culture that professes and
adheres to different levels of competence would generate positives instead of divisive biases. You cannot make
decisions based on a bias or mandate. Decisions can only
be the best when you place the best fitting square peg
in the square hole and round peg in the round hole. Anything
else is a degree of incompetence.
The other side of the coin is your own bias. If you don’t
keep an open mind and hear what the other biased
side says, then you won’t ever know. To read, what
those you disagree with say, means you are choice neutral and
probably a good friend to have regardless of differences.
Funny how most marriage relationships that seem to work
best are created by opposite personalities in action and
thought. On the other hand most friendship relationships
that works best are similar personalities in action and
thought. Having said that you’ve no doubt made your
best choice in marriage and your worst choice in association.
What on earth does this have to do with news you ask? Well think about it.
The news source you are drawn to is like your friend, they massage your ego
by having you think that the whole world thinks just like you. Maybe it's time
to start treating it as a marriage and expand your horizons. Include those
who don't appeal to your bias but who actually challenge you intellectually.
Expand your horizons so you can make more informed decisions.
Yes there is false news, yes there is bias and yes you
have the choice to make your own decision and base those
on what you perceive to be facts. That’s
what separates those who lead from those who blindly follow.
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 9, 2017
COMMENTS THAT STAY
The Sale of YOUR Utility
The sale of PDI. Mayor Daryl Bennett and
Councilors; Dan McWilliams, Henry Clarke, Andrew Beamer, Lesley
Parnell and Dave Haacke voted in favour of the sale. Councilors;
Diane Therrien, Dean Pappas, Don Vassiliadis, Gary Baldwin
and Keith Riel voted against the sale. Depending on how you
believe this should be a big part of your
voting decision in the next Municipal Election.
If you think
you will see any proceeds forget it. They are busy spending
it already. Costly studies like the silly arena and hotel/condo
complex downtown on the Peterborough Works Property that never
needed to be moved, this writer's opinion. Contrary to what
you are told that the City could not enter into arrangement
with PDI, the Works actually took care of PDI vehicles that
will now cease, a reduction in work, not an increase. The list
of spending opportunities they are exploring is as long as
it is bad.
To end on a positive note, thank you Dean Del Mastro it seems your railroad is about to become a reality. Dean was a builder and uniter not a single issue person.
OCPC has taken control of OUR PETERBOROUGH "Civilian" Police
Board. Our current Mayor claims this to be a "tremendous
for the community.
He was just absolved of the crime of trying
to do his job as mayor. This is not a victory but
is a major blow against the community! Some
get a competitive quote, an OPP quote. Other rumours persist
that the City of Peterborough is subsidizing the policing
cost for Lakefield and Millbrook. An OPP quote makes
sense as the Province is now running the show and if they
can do it as well, embed current staff and at a lower cost
then let them have it! If I read the
police act correctly the province will subsidize a community
Here is the OPP
billing platform for 2017.
Our current average
cost appears to be around $625 per
property (residential and business).
How much is Lakefield
and Millbrook paying per property?
City of Peterborough,
The City of Peterborough is fishing for a a
new brand. As it can no longer claim The Electric
City, since dumping our Electric Utility, PDI, try Unelectric
City with the tag line "lots of gas
and limited brightness".
Editorial PTBOregion.com, March 12, 2017